<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>MOI Matching on Pin High Press</title>
    <link>https://pinhighpress.com/tags/moi-matching/</link>
    <description>Recent content in MOI Matching on Pin High Press</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://pinhighpress.com/tags/moi-matching/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>MOI Matching: Why Your Irons Are Built Differently Now</title>
      <link>https://pinhighpress.com/posts/moi-matching-why-your-irons-are-built-differently-now/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://pinhighpress.com/posts/moi-matching-why-your-irons-are-built-differently-now/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;For most of the modern era, iron sets have been built to a single, simple target: matched swing weight. Every club in the bag, from the 4-iron down to the pitching wedge, is built so it feels roughly the same on that familiar A0-through-E scale, the club balanced around a fixed fulcrum point so the swing feels consistent as the length and loft change club to club. It has worked well enough for decades that most golfers have never questioned it. A quieter, more technical alternative has been gaining ground in club design over the last few years, and it starts from a different question entirely: not how does the club feel, but how does the head behave when you miss.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
